قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Tips and Tricks / Breonna Taylor case: Delay in publication of Grand Jury recordings intended

Breonna Taylor case: Delay in publication of Grand Jury recordings intended



The highly unusual disclosure of a secret grand jury trial was expected on Wednesday after a Jefferson County State Court judge ordered recordings of the two and a half day presentation to the panel before noon local time.

Cameron requested the delay in a motion filed Tuesday, arguing that there was a need to protect the interests of witnesses, particularly those “individuals named on the record”. His office seeks to “edit personal identifiers of a named person and edit both names and personal identifiers of a private citizen”.

Cameron’s office said in a statement Wednesday that the recording lasted more than 20 hours and “required additional time … to edit witnesses̵

7; personal information, including addresses and phone numbers”.

According to a statement, the judge should decide on the application on Wednesday.

The release of the tape was awaited after a grand judge petitioned in court for all grand jury records, transcripts and reports relating to the police-involved shooting case to be made available to the public.
The judge has suggested that the Kentucky attorney general may have misrepresented the case presented to the panel to the public, according to an attorney for the judge.

The attorney general initially declined to publish transcripts or grand jury records, despite increasing public requests from the Mayor of Louisville, the governor of Kentucky, and lawyers for Taylor’s family.

Former Louisville Police Officer pleads not guilty of the murder of Breonna Taylor

However, late Monday night, Cameron announced that he would comply with a judge’s decision that a recording of the grand jury’s presentation should be placed on the court file. He had previously said that publishing the presentation would disrupt other investigations.

Cameron said in an interview with CNN subsidiary WDRB on Tuesday evening that the grand jury could have made an “assessment of the various charges” against the officials involved in the shooting.

“If they wanted to evaluate a variety of charges, they could have. But our recommendation was that Mattingly and Cosgrove were justified in their actions and behavior,” he said.

Officers Myles Cosgrove and Jonathan Mattingly were two of the three officers present on the night of March 13th when Taylor was killed in a botched farm.

Taylor, a lifeguard and aspiring nurse, was killed in her home while plainclothes officers executed an arrest warrant without knocking.

Cosgrove and Mattingly were not charged in the case, although Cameron said Cosgrove filed the fatal shot, which he believes was justified because Taylor’s boyfriend shot police officers first. A third officer, Brett Hankison, was charged with three willful threats in the first degree for blindly shooting an adjacent apartment that was occupied. Hankison has pleaded not guilty.


Source link