Microsoft is currently working on a foldable Surface tablet with two screens that also runs Android apps. It is said to be running on the company's upcoming Chrome OS competitor, Windows Core OS.
The most important thing first ̵
The probable answer starts with Core OS itself. Win32 applications, that is, traditional Windows programs, are not inherently supported. This leads to a significant gap in the availability of apps (think of the original interface with Windows RT? Oof.). Originally it was said that the core operating system would push UWP (Universal Windows Platform) apps, but we did not really see the increase in UWP apps Microsoft was likely to have hoped for. In fact, Microsoft itself seems to abandon UWP by and large, which is pretty meaningful.
So, what about this lighter version of Core OS, supposedly running on this mythical dual-screen device? Back in the same position as Windows RT at that time. Instead, Microsoft looks like it's taking a page from Google Playbook and adding Android app support to that particular build of Core OS. Nevertheless, some things have to be considered here.
This does not mean that Core OS can fully access the Google Play Store. This is only possible for Google Play certified devices, and there is a possibility that Microsoft will not take this path. Instead, it probably needs to set up its own app store, which is easier said than done. This means that Android app developers will not only need to support apps in Google's ecosystem (and possibly Amazon), but also in Microsoft. While this does not directly duplicate the work, means more tests, more uploads, and the like. In addition, support for Android apps on any non-Android / Chrome OS-enabled device is likely to be difficult and erroneous, resulting in additional troubleshooting issues. Android apps can run on Chrome OS on Linux kernel based (just like Android) to run properly. In fact, support for Android apps in the beta phase for has been much longer than expected by Google (and has still not reached "stable" on some Chrome OS devices). They are better now than they have ever been before, but there is still much to do here – they do not feel at all native, which was probably the hope all the time.
So if Google fought for it If Android apps are fully functional on Chrome OS, what makes Microsoft think they can work better on Windows? Sure, Microsoft has done a great job of developing and supporting its own Android apps (they're all very good), but adding that emulation layer to Windows is another monster.
Well, I do not say that this is impossible. However, the hurdles that need to be taken are even greater than Google's to bring Android apps to Chrome OS. It starts with something that is primarily outside Microsoft's hands: getting developers on board, testing, supporting, and uploading their apps to another platform and app store.
And actually, none of this matters if users do not want this feature at all. As a regular Chromebook user, I see the status of Android apps on Chrome OS daily, and I'll tell you the following: Web apps are always my first choice over Android apps. For me, Android apps are the option "This is my only choice" – not the first place I go when I have to do something.
So, what do you say: Do you want Android apps on Windows? Do you see a utility here if there are no Win32 applications? Let us talk about it. Join the survey and let us know what you think.
Microsoft is working on a Surface device with two screens running Android apps. But do we really want that? https://t.co/RFV9UyuHmZ[19659003[-ReviewGeek(@reviewgeeksite) June 25, 2019