قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Tips and Tricks / Federal judge denies Trump, GOP contesting ballot boxes in Pennsylvania

Federal judge denies Trump, GOP contesting ballot boxes in Pennsylvania



Pennsylvania District Court Justice Nicholas Ranjan also declined to enact policies in Pennsylvania that would allow postal ballot signatures not to exactly match voters’ signatures on file with the state and require electoral officials to live in the county they live in work on election day.

He also denied Republicans’ fears of electoral fraud, saying it was possible but not likely.

“While plaintiffs may not have to prove actual electoral fraud, they must at least demonstrate that such fraud is ‘certainly imminent’. They have not faced this burden Opinion.

Ranjan, who was appointed to the bank by Trump, noted that Pennsylvania state officials and the Supreme Court had already resolved many voting issues for the November election.

“The Tribunal finds that the electoral regulations enacted by the General Assembly and implemented by the defendants do not materially encumber the right to vote. They are rational. They advance important state interests. They are consistent with the sophisticated electoral security measures of the Commonwealth. They do not violate those United States Constitution. Otherwise you will not be questioned by this court, “he wrote.

An appeal could be lodged against the judgment.

CNN has asked the Trump campaign for comment.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro called the verdict “a victory for voters and our democracy,”

; adding in a statement: “We have been in court for months to protect the right to vote and work to bring that outcome to you to achieve all. Vote by mail or in person, whichever you choose. Your vote counts. “

Republicans in Pennsylvania have already challenged state electoral regulations in the US Supreme Court.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court previously allowed election officials to count postal ballot papers received up to three days after the election, even if the postmark was illegible. This decision would make it possible to count votes from thousands of Pennsylvanians who could have been rejected because of their arrival after election day.

Republican lawyers filed an urgency petition with the Supreme Court asking them to block the decision.

This story was updated with additional developments on Saturday.


Source link