قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Tips and Tricks / What Amy Coney Barrett’s 2020 nomination means: NPR

What Amy Coney Barrett’s 2020 nomination means: NPR

President Trump and Supreme Court candidate Amy Coney Barrett walk down the Rose Garden Colonnade on Saturday. Focusing on the court a few weeks before the elections could help empower conservatives in key states.

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Hide label

Toggle labeling

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

President Trump and Supreme Court candidate Amy Coney Barrett walk down the Rose Garden Colonnade on Saturday. Focusing on the court a few weeks before the elections could help empower conservatives in key states.

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Supporters and opponents of Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination wasted no time starting a fierce battle to get her approval within just 37 days of the election.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Has Republican support to move on with the ratification process and ratify Barrett in the Senate before November 3rd unless her review evolves.

But a flurry of emails from advocacy groups advocating abortion and abortion rights, gun problems, health care, and more promised to fight hard – making the Supreme Court a focus on the last few days of the presidential election would.

It also means it is likely to be a central theme in important Senate races across the country. Control of the Chamber is at play in these elections, and Republicans are facing tough challenges in several states where the issue is being advertised.

Recent polls have shown that Democratic candidate Joe Biden stands before President Trump, but the focus has been mostly on the president’s handling of the coronavirus. Changing the subject on the future of the court and the prospect of a Conservative majority of 6 to 3 could help motivate GOP voters in key swing states and give new urgency to elections.

A meeting of liberal groups outside the Supreme Court was scheduled for Sunday afternoon, and Senators, who are slated to take a break for the final fall route, will return to the Capitol earlier this week for a confirmation process that will be at the center stage with the efforts to put together another coronavirus relief package that is fading.

Barrett is expected to meet with the Senators earlier this week, and the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to begin its hearings on October 12. The panel is expected to hold four days of hearing, with time for the traditional opening day, and interview Barrett and testimony from outside witnesses. The panel doesn’t have much time to complete the FBI background check and review the responses to the committee’s long questionnaire that nominees submit prior to the hearings.

The FBI found on Friday that the White House is requesting the scope of such a background investigation. “The FBI is conducting background investigations as part of its established investigative process and as quickly as possible while ensuring that the background investigations are accurate and complete,” the bureau said.

“This should be a straightforward and quick confirmation. It should be very simple – good luck,” said President Trump at his event on Saturday in the rose garden, announcing his election, but the crowd of supporters laughed. “It will be very quick. I am sure it will be extremely uncontroversial. We said that last time, didn’t we?”

Barrett is Trump’s third candidate for the Supreme Court. His last election was Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who was under additional scrutiny on a sexual assault allegation.

But while Trump predicts expediency this time around, senators on both sides of the aisle and outside groups preparing for a controversial trial have no illusions that it will be easy, even if the outcome isn’t really in doubt.

Mike Davis, the founder of the Article III Project, a group formed to aid the presidential judicial candidates, said the night before Barrett’s nomination was even announced that his group was “taking off the gloves, the brass knuckles.” would put on and serve again. ” the left-wing attack on President Trump’s next Supreme Court candidate – a fight that made Kavanaugh look like a stroll in the park. ”

As Barrett confirmed on Saturday, it would fill the space left by the death of a pioneering woman – Ruth Bader Ginsburg – who became a left-wing pop culture icon, nicknamed “Notorious RBG”.

GOP supporters have already tried to classify their choice as appealing to women. The Senate Republican campaign arm began selling “Notorious ACB” t-shirts.

Conservatives focus on Barrett’s record as a federal judge and the fact that she received support from three Senate Democrats when she was upheld in 7th Circuit Court in 2017. They embrace her as justice in the form of Antonin Scalia, for whom she is employed. Barrett said of Scalia on Saturday, “His legal philosophy is mine too.”

For Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Who balances concerns about control of the Chamber with its primary goal of reshaping federal justice, there is an opportunity to affirm Barrett, who may have held a Conservative majority for decades Court would install. is an incentive to move forward.

However, a Washington Post-ABC poll released on Friday shows that there could be a backlash in the vote so close to the election. Fifty-seven percent of those polled said the appointment of a judge to the Supreme Court should wait until after the election, and 38 percent supported the actions of the president and the GOP-controlled Senate.

Trump was keen to make the subject a regular part of his blunt speech – he appeared at a rally in Middletown, Pennsylvania, in front of a large red screen that read “Fill That Seat!” And he extolled his numerous judicial appointments, each with a lifetime of tenure.

Democrats realizing they don’t have the votes to block Barrett’s endorsement center on the health care debate and the future of the Affordable Care Act. A case pending ahead of the fall Supreme Court session has the potential to dismantle the law, and Senate Democrats one after the other pointed out that Barrett was publicly against the law, arguing that they were in court in the middle of a pandemic risk coverage is being put to millions of Americans.

“The deadly COVID-19 pandemic has killed more than 200,000 Americans in just a few months. But rather than solving the many life and death problems faced by working families during COVID-19, Trump and Senate Republicans are focusing on it To prevail.This nomination is a transparent takeover of power so that they can achieve their long-awaited goal of repealing Affordable Care Act and disconnecting healthcare from millions of people – including all COVID-19 survivors who are now suffering from a pre-existing disease “said Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth in a written statement that she would not vote on the candidate.

External groups accused Barrett of possibly casting the casting vote for the ACA court. Demand Justice, a progressive group that spoke out against the presidential candidates, called Barrett “anti-ACA Amy Coney Barrett” and argued that the trial, which would lead to hearings in weeks, was unfair. On Saturday night, the group projected the words “SAVE HEALTH CARE” onto the side of the Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC

Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, a liberal group focused on equality and social justice, told NPR before the president made his Barrett nomination official that Ginsburg’s death was a “wake-up call” that would help solving the problem of health care front and center for many who have taken the subject for granted.

“I know it energizes our side. … Neither of us wanted this to happen, but it is making very visual trends that we knew were there. Those of us who are very active, knew this was an extremely important choice. ” Said Smeal.

Smeal’s group has teamed up with other women’s organizations to create a super-PAC called Vote for Equality, which is running competitive Senate races on college campuses in seven states to educate younger voters about the legal issues that The Supreme Court could end up in court.

Biden’s runner-up, Senator Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and will be given the opportunity to interview Barrett, a moment that is likely to get wall-to-wall national television coverage.

However, being barely able to change the outcome, she can take the opportunity to highlight the issues she believes are at stake in the election and spend less time dealing with controversial issues deal that separate the voters who want to attract the ticket.

The two Senate Democrats who are now in the Senate and backed Barrett’s 2017 Federal Bank nomination – Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia – said they would not vote now because Senate GOP leaders agreed with the Work around problem process.

“I cannot support a process that risks further division of the American people at a time when we need to come together urgently. I am not going to vote to vote for Judge Coney Barrett or a Supreme Court candidate before election day on November 3rd I urge my Republicans to slow down their friends, put people before politics and give their voters the opportunity to vote, “Manchin said.

Source link